Tuesday, May 17, 2016

Will there be any benefit for Banks to create highly expensive infrastructure for IMM models

BCBS has recently released consultative document, Reducing variation in credit risk-weighted assets – constraints on the use of internal model approaches. It proposed that banks be barred from using internal models when they calculate how risky certain assets are. Lending to other financial institutions and large companies, and holding equities are the areas most affected.

The proposed changes to the IRB approaches set out in this consultative document include a number of complementary measures that aim to:
1.  Reduce the complexity of the regulatory framework and improve comparability
2. Address excessive variability in the capital requirements for credit risk.

Specifically, the Basel Committee proposes to:
  • Remove the option to use the IRB approaches for certain exposures, where it is judged that the model parameters cannot be estimated sufficiently reliably for regulatory capital purposes 
  • Adopt exposure-level, model-parameter floors to ensure a minimum level of conservatism for portfolios where the IRB approaches remain available 
  • Provide greater specification of parameter estimation practices to reduce variability in risk weighted assets (RWA) for portfolios where the IRB approaches remain available.

Under the proposal, banks will have to use a standardised method of calculating the riskiness of loans to financial institutions and to large corporates with assets of more than €50bn. The Basel group believes there is so much publicly available information on the credit risk of such institutions, that banks are rarely able to provide a better estimate than an approach standardised by regulators.

These proposed regulation are already dubbed as BASEL IV by street. Banks have already spent billions of dollars to comply with the plethora of regulatory changes after the 2008 financial crisis.
Argument is if banks will not be able to use the IMM models for most of the derivative portfolio, as most of the derivative trades happens among financial firms, then how much benefit will banks have in developing highly complex IMM models.

2 comments:

  1. This is more official now with FT confirming the same view.

    https://next.ft.com/content/672e8d6a-1d63-11e6-b286-cddde55ca122

    ReplyDelete
  2. Merkur 700c (5) Merkur 700c - OXN
    Merkur 700c (5) Merkur 메리트 카지노 주소 700c - OXN. By Murt Groves · 2017 · Cited by 온카지노 45 — Merkur 700c (5) Merkur 700c. Merkur 700c, the successor to the famous 570, is a new and improved version of 제왕카지노 its iconic closed comb head.

    ReplyDelete